Title: The Buffalo Hunter Hunter
Author: Stephen Graham Jones
Publisher: Saga Press
Publication date: March 18, 2025
Length: 448 pages
Genre: Horror / historical fiction
Source: Library
Rating:
From the New York Times bestselling author of The Only Good Indians comes a tale of the American West, writ in blood.
This chilling historical novel is set in the nascent days of the state of Montana, following a Blackfeet Indian named Good Stab as he haunts the fields of the Blackfeet Nation looking for justice.
It begins when a diary written in 1912 by a Lutheran pastor is discovered within a wall in 2012. What is unveiled is a slow massacre, a nearly forgotten chain of events that goes back to 217 Blackfeet dead in the snow, told in the transcribed interviews with Good Stab, who shares the narrative of his peculiar and unnaturally long life over a series of confessional visits.
This is an American Indian revenge story, captured in the vivid voices of the time, by one of the new masters of literary horror, Stephen Graham Jones.
Unpopular opinion time: This story of a vampire seeking revenge for the massacre of his people, the Blackfeet of Montana, should have been right up my alley… and yet, I had to force myself to stick with it and slog my way through to the end.
This book has an endless number of rave reviews, including from media sources and bloggers I tend to align with. And yet, it just didn’t work for me.
There’s a great premise: A newly discovered diary left behind by a Lutheran pastor in 1912 reveals a shocking set of confessions from a Blackfeet named Good Stab. Good Stab seeks out Arthur Beaucarne to share the story of his unnaturally long life, his transformation into a vampire, and the punishments he’s meted out to those he deems responsible for murdering his people.
And yet, I found myself disengaged and frustrated throughout much of the book. There are some compelling and horrifying set pieces, some very moving interludes as Good Stab recounts what’s happened to the Blackfeet and to the buffalos… and yet, the story he tells is full of names, places, and incidents that loop and cross, sometimes dropping important pieces of information into long bits of a tale so that they get more or less buried. I found it confusing to track the who and how and why of many of the developments, and ultimately ended up caring far less than I should have, with what should have been big revelations falling flat.
I’m definitely in the minority on this one. By the end, I just wanted it all to be over.
Sigh. Not a book for me.
Bookshelf Fantasies 
I’m still on the fence about this one, but I’m sorry to hear that this didn’t work out for you 😦
On the fence about reading it? I know so many people consider it one of their best books from last year, so experiences seem to really vary.
Yeah, I’m not sure if I want to read it or not.
It was a tough read at times, and by that I mean very dense. I’ve read quite a bit of Jone’s work and so it didn’t surprise me. Sorry it didn’t work for you!
I was disappointed — I had such high expectations! I’d read one of his books previously and thought highly of it, so this really was a letdown. I think it was the storytelling style most of all that I didn’t enjoy, because the concept and the historical elements certainly interested me.
I’ve not read this one (and don’t plan to), but I nearly choked on the mouthful of coffee I’d just taken when I saw your rating! This book seems to be so confirmed as a darling for so many people, but of course it’s not going to work for everyone…
I was shocked myself! I struggled a bit at the beginning, then started feeling more engaged… but there was just something about the storytelling style that kept pushing me away and making this an uphill climb for me to finish!
Sounds like it has a lot packed in that wasn’t always interesting to read. I keep seeing rave reviews that I was surprised at the change here.
I’m definitely in the minority on this one — everyone else seems to think it’s a masterpiece!