Stuff I Love: TV Time!

I’m a reader, but I do love me a good TV show.

Am I excited when my favorite shows are on? Yeah, you could say that.

Am I excited when my favorite shows are on? Yeah, you could say that.

“Good” is, of course, subject to interpretation, but for me, the best TV shows are the ones that give me some of what I get from the best books:

Character must-haves:

  • Characters who are interesting, smart, and with a purpose.
  • Development: The best shows, for me, are the ones that show their characters learning, changing, and progressing over time.
  • Consistency: Nothing worse than a show that suddenly has a character acting completely “out-of-character” for the sake of plot. Ugh. Way to alienate your viewers, show.
  • Something in their lives besides a love interest. Shows that are only about love triangles are so boring.

Plot must-haves:

  • Consistency: You can’t ignore events from season 1 or retcon them just because they’re no longer convenient.
  • Mythology: For shows with mythologies — stick to them! I hate when a show suddenly changes the rules just because they need a new twist.
  • Stakes: I don’t mean the wooden kind. If we’re supposed to care about the show or its characters, then there has to be something on the line.
  • Forward motion: I cannot stand shows where, at the end of the season, all of the characters are more or less at the same place or in the same situation that they were at the start.

Other essentials:

  • Clever dialogue. Quirky is good. Smart is good. Quotability is golden.
  • Choreography: If there’s action, it should be fun to watch.
  • Set design, costumes, props: Visually engaging, please.

I’m much more of a drama fan, although I do watch a few comedies here and there. Still, it’s the on-going dramas that catch me, hold me, and bring me back week after week. As with my book preferences, I enjoy shows that keep my brain engaged, that challenge and surprise me, that have an internal logic, and that build each episode on what’s gone before.

I don’t watch crime shows or police procedurals… but then again, I don’t generally read crime novels or read mysteries. (I make more exceptions in my reading life than in my TV life.)

I tend not to read soapy books, and mostly avoid soapy shows as well. (Eye of the beholder, though — my definitions and  yours may be nothing alike.)

This past week was a heavy TV-viewing week, as a lot of  “my” shows came back after their Olympics hiatus and a few other returned for a new season. I think I had about 8 hours worth of episodes that I *had* to watch last week or risk seeing serious spoilers, and a couple more will be added this coming week. So maybe it’s no wonder that I’m always whining about not having enough time or staying up too late reading every night?

Still, at the end of a busy day of work, family, and getting the kid to do his homework, I like my hour or so of decompression in front of the screen. It soothes me and gives me downtime, gives me a chance to unwind (and eat a bowl of popcorn), and is a good de-stresser before curling up to read.

Sure, if I absolutely had to choose, I’d pick books any time. But why can’t I have both? And while I’m completely justified in telling my kid, who never reads without arm-twisting, “turn off the TV and go read a book!”, nobody around my house can claim that I don’t read enough… even if I am glued to the TV like a total fanatic when my shows are on.

From time to time, you may see me writing about my favorite TV shows… when I’m in the mood for a non-bookish moment or two. So stay tuned… later this week, I’ll tell you about one of my newer favorites and why I love it so much!

Fangirling with the Doctor

I couldn’t sleep last night, and maybe it’s because my head was filled with visions of multiple Doctors, each with his own shiny or banged up but totally lovable TARDIS.

(If you’re not a fan of Doctor Who, go ahead and click on something else. Really, I don’t mind. Excuse me my moment of fangirlishness!)

Last night was the theatrical screening of The Day of the Doctor, and it just could not have been more delightful.

The show itself was better than I’d even hoped. Seeing Ten and Eleven together was brilliant, and John Hurt was perfect. And Billie Piper! I’d heard she would be in it, but I was expecting Rose Tyler… and instead she was not Rose, and she was still wonderful.

Listen, I have nothing super meaningful to say about how this episode changes everything, what it means for the overall mythology, and where it goes from here. There are plenty of folks writing oodles upon oodles of essays, reviews, and critiques who really do know the Who-verse better than I do, and I gladly tip my fez to all of them.

All I want to say is: Last night was a perfect example of why I love being connected to a fandom.

tardis

I wore my Van Gogh TARDIS. Subtle, yet elegant, wouldn’t you say?

On a random Monday evening, to spend the night at a movie theater surrounded by people who love what I love — that’s bliss.

We could exchange knowing nods over clever wordplay while waiting in the popcorn line. Gaze admiringly at the committed souls decked out in full-on steampunk gear. Admire the clever T-shirts. Say “awwwww” over the 10-year-old boy in a tweed jacket and bowtie. Giggle over all the people with sonic screwdriver ringtones.

It was one of those events where you just know you’re surrounded by your people. And it felt great.

Except for the woman sitting behind me who wouldn’t STFU. See, that doesn’t happen in my living room. Other than that, however… it was kind of perfect.

We cheered when each new/old Doctor appeared on screen. A glimpse of Twelve’s eyes! All of the earlier Doctors on screen! Silly sight gags with sonic screwdrivers! I’ve rarely sat with a happier crowd. All the feels, truly.

I’ll admit that I like, but I don’t love, the Eleventh Doctor. Much more of a Nine or Ten fan, really. And yes, I’d occasionally zone out during some of the more convoluted recent plotlines. But Doctor Who doesn’t have to make sense. It’s going strong at 50, and I can’t wait to see what happens next. Bring on the Twelfth Doctor!

Geronimo!

Allons-y!

Say hello to Claire Beauchamp Randall Fraser!

Big news in Outlander world today! After driving fans everywhere absolutely bonkers with all the waiting, Starz has just announced the casting of Claire in its upcoming Outlander TV series.

Say hello to Caitriona Balfe, our new Claire!

CF

I’ll have to take Diana Gabaldon’s word for it in terms of Caitriona’s acting abilities (quote from DG’s Facebook page:

yes, I saw her audition videos with Sam (they were _great_!)

… but she certainly has the right look! Beautiful, isn’t she? Who else is getting really excited about the series?

Outlander fans, what do you think?

Why I love Joss Whedon #867-ish

How I Live Now: Movie Trailer!

Last year, I wrote a Flashback Friday post about How I Live Now by Meg Rosoff, one of my all-time favorite books. And now, looky here! The movie trailer is out… and it looks amazing!

Have you read the book? Are you excited about the movie?

Outlander casting news: Here’s Frank!

The dual role of Frank Randall/Black Jack Randall has been cast! And it’s a great choice: Tobias Menzies (Rome, Game of Thrones) will be playing this key part in the upcoming Starz series.

Say hello to Jamie Fraser!

I’ve made no secret of the fact that I’m a huge fan of the Outlander series by Diana Gabaldon… and while I’ve been participating in the mad Tweet-fest over this week’s Outlander news, I haven’t actually shared it here. So — drumroll, please, — for the last few Outlander fans who haven’t heard the news yet, say hello to Sam Heughan, signed this week to play Jamie Fraser in the upcoming Outlander TV series on Starz.

UPDATED: 12/26/2014:

I just couldn’t stand the fact that my old post with a photoshopped Sam keeps getting hits, since we know that Sam’s Jamie doesn’t look at all like this:

SHphotoshop2
So in order to set the record straight, I’m adding in a “real” Jamie pic of Sam, in all his wonderful glory. Enjoy!

OUT_108-20140509-ND_0135.jpg

There now. I feel much better. (~Lisa @ BSF, 12/26/2014)

The 100 All-Time Greatest Novels… depending on who you ask.

Have you seen the newest issue of Entertainment Weekly? The cover proclaims that the double issue includes “The 100 All-Time Greatest” of all things EW-ish: movies, TV shows, albums, and yes, novels. It’s actually quite fun to read through, doing the quick mental “saw that”, “didn’t watch that”, “liked it”, “are you kidding me??” checklists.

Annoyingly, the EW website only provides the top 10 for each list, so you have to actually pick up the magazine or subscribe online to see their full top 100 list… or head to this website, which has helpfully listed the top 100 novels as selected by the EW editors.

So how did the EW editors do? Overall, I think it’s a pretty great list. Anna Karenina at #1? I suppose I could argue for any of several other great novels — but AK works too.

I was thrilled to see that the Harry Potter series made the top 10, and equally happy to see other fantasy favorites on the list, including His Dark Materials by Philip Pullman, The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams, and The Hobbit by J. R. R. Tolkien.

By quick count, I’ve read 41 out of the 100 books listed. Of the ones I haven’t read, in many cases I’ve read other books by the same author, just not the specific one(s) listed. For example:

  • Charles Dickens: I haven’t read Great Expectations or Bleak House, which were listed (I know, I know…) — but A Tale of Two Cities, which wasn’t listed, is always on my personal top 100 list.
  • I have read Anna Karenina, but not War and Peace (#28) or the various other classic Russian novels that also made the list.
  • I’ve read Beloved (#9) and several other Toni Morrison books not on the list, but not Song of Solomon (#52).
  • Bring Up The Bodies (#79) by Hilary Mantel is on the list, but not Wolf Hall, which I recently read.
  • I could go on with Faulkner, Forster, and Bellow, but that’s enough of a sampling!

I do have to question the selection of The Hobbit but not the Lord of the Rings trilogy. In my mind, The Hobbit is fun but LOTR is a masterpiece.

I love that they included Are You There God? It’s Me, Margaret. by Judy Blume. I wrote a post early in my blogging days about the influence of this book on countless women who grew up during a certain time, wondering if girls today still read Judy Blume. For me and my friends, this was the book for pre-teen girls.

I don’t neccesarily put too much stock in any one “greatest of all time” list. It all comes down to perspective and opinion, after all. Still, I found EW’s top 100 to be a great representation of a mix of genres, eras, and authors, with everything from centuries-old classics to newer books from the last year or two.

So what do you think of EW’s selection of the 100 greatest novels of all-time? Any glaring omissions? Anything that just doesn’t deserve to be there?

For me, I’m feeling a bit inspired to check out a few of these titles that have always been “oh, gotta read it someday!” books for me. And it’s a terrific reminder of some books from my long-ago reading days that need a re-visit ASAP.

And for fun, check out their top movie and TV lists too. You may be pleasantly surprised!

Much Ado: A fangirl goes to the movies

Today, I had the absolute pleasure of seeing the newest movie version of Much Ado About Nothing, which was screened as part of the San Francisco International Film Festival.

What can I say? It was fantastic.

I’m an unabashed fangirl when it comes to Joss Whedon and his world, and the fact that so many actors from the Whedon-verse — Amy Acker, Alexis Denisof, Fran Kranz, Nathan Fillion, Sean Maher, and more — had key roles in Much Ado made it all the sweeter to see.

On top of which, I’m a book geek with a fondness for Shakespeare, and although I’m much more familiar with the tragedies, I’m always up for a good Shakespearean comedy. Much Ado About Nothing happens to be one that I’ve never read and had never seen before, and I did have a bit of trepidation ahead of time as to whether I’d actually “get” it. Not to worry, though. From the opening scenes, it was easy to pick up the rhythms of the language, and it all flowed beautifully.

Filmed in black and white in a modern setting, the art direction and style of the movie is contemporary and quick. The staging allows the actors to shine, particularly in their use of body language and interactions, and their comedic timing is impeccable. Nathan Fillion in particular was hilarious, Amy Acker and Alexis Denisof were sharp and witty as Beatrice and Benedick, and Fran Kranz as the love-smitten Claudio was both puppy-dog sweet and quietly dangerous. Really, I could go on and on about the cast, but suffice it to say that there was not a one that I could find fault with. Their line deliveries were as smooth as they’d be if they were, well, in some other Joss production. For the man who perfected the art of quippiness, directing Shakespeare must have been a natural fit.

Both Amy Acker and Alexis Denisof were present for the screening, both to introduce the film and to participate in a Q&A session afterward. They were funny and charming, and got Joss on speakerphone before the movie to say hi to the audience. Adorable.

So here’s the trailer:

The movie opens June 7th in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. Don’t miss it!

Spike — A Dark Place: Comfort Food for the Buffy-phile

Mini-review: Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Spike — A Dark Place by Victor Gischler, Paul Lee, Jo Chen et. al.
(Release date: June 18, 2013)

The world has been a darker, lonelier, and far less quippy place since the TV series Buffy the Vampire Slayer went off the air almost ten years ago, in May of 2003. (Bow your heads for a moment of silence, please. Thank you). But the devoted fans of the Buffy-verse had not heard the last of the Slayer and the Scoobies. In 2007, Dark Horse Comics began publication of Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Season 8 — in comic book format! Legions of fans cheered! Currently up to season 9 and going strong, the comics are written under the imprimatur of Buffy creator and geek god Joss Whedon, and are considered “canon”, for those who care about such distinctions. The comic follows Buffy and the gang forward from the end of the TV series, and it’s a wonder to behold.

Coming in June 2013, Spike – A Dark Place is somewhat of a sidebar to the main storyline of season 9, picking up right after the events of On Your Own (season 9, volume 2), and focusing on everyone’s favorite bad-boy-vampire-with-a-soul (and amazing cheekbones), our dearly beloved Spike. Spike’s going through some stuff and has fallen into a deep depression, and even his trusty team of adoring spaceship-flying bugs (it’s a long story) can’t quite get him to snap out of it. Of course, bad guys pop in, as bad guys do, and Spike is caught up in the action once again.

I realize that none of the above (bugs! who fly spaceships!) will make sense to anyone who hasn’t kept up with seasons 8 and 9. Which raises the question: What are you waiting for? If you watched the TV show, then good gods — get thee to a comic book store at once! Of course, if you never watched Buffy at all… well, first of all, I’m not sure that we have anything left to say to one another (kidding!), and second of all — drop whatever else you’re doing and get yourself some Buffy DVDs! And don’t stop until you’ve watched all seven seasons of Buffy, five seasons of Angel, and you’re ready to read some amazing comics!

Okay, so this supposedly-a-book-review has devolved into a fan rant. Sorry ’bout that.

But check out the comics. The new Spike book features terrific artwork, especially Jo Chen’s magnificent covers, which represent Spike actor James Marsters in all his Buffy-era glory. The storyline is funny, action-packed, and quite faithful to the Spike character that we know and love. Once I picked up Spike – A Dark Place, I couldn’t put it down, and I’m eager for more, more, more — more Spike, more Buffy, more of the entire wonderful Buffy-verse! Please, Dark Horse, don’t ever stop! I’d happily continue reading the Buffy comics and spin-offs for years — decades — to come.