I do love to re-read my favorite books. Don’t we all?
But have you ever re-read a book you didn’t love the first time around?
In thinking about it, it’s hard to come up with reasons to do so. After all, if I didn’t think it was great, why would I want to revisit it?
That’s been my take on the issue up to now. The only reasons I can think of to reread a book that wasn’t a favorite would be:
- for a book group or discussion
- after reading someone else’s take on the book and realizing I might have missed something
- when there’s a new TV or movie adaptation coming out and generating a lot of buzz
- wanting to give a favorite author another shot
- trying the book in a different medium
My most recent experience with re-reading books that weren’t huge hits the first time around have to do with the last two bullet points on my list.
The author in question was Gail Carriger. I adored her Parasol Protectorate series — but found that two books in subsequent series, Espionage & Etiquette and Prudence, just didn’t appeal to me as much. (Want proof? Check out my lukewarm reviews!)
But recently, Gail Carriger released a couple of shorter fictions that I wanted to read (see my write-up, here), and those stories pulled me right back into her steampunk/supernatural world. What’s more, I was dying to stay in that world. And that made me think — had I really given those other books a proper chance?
I’ve become more and more convinced that reading doesn’t happen in a vacuum. What sort of mood was I in when I read a particular book? Where was I? What else was going on in my life? Maybe, in some circumstances, the main reason I didn’t take to a particular book has more to do with my own situation. In other words: It’s not you, it’s me.
(Not always, of course. Some books are just not good, and there’s no prettying it up.)
So, in the case of the Gail Carriger books, I decided to try again. This time, I thought I’d go with audiobooks.
I started listening to book 1 in the Finishing School series, Etiquette and Espionage, and absolutely could not stop. I loved the first book, and continued on straight through until I’d listened to all four books. (For why I loved them, see this post.) In fact, I was so in love with listening to this series that I was in dire need of a Carriger fix to feed my addiction once I’d finished, so I hunted down the audiobook of Prudence pretty much the second after finishing Manners & Mutiny.
Oh, my parasol. LOVED it. How could I love Prudence so much when I didn’t love it when I read it the first time? For me, there’s no getting around the fact that the amazing audiobook narrator, Moira Quirk, is a big factor. She does such a great job of capturing the different voices, the snippy/snarky banter, the nuances of aristocratic Victorian society — certain of her voices, in particular, leave me rolling on the floor in helpless laughter.
But would I love the printed books too? Probably. It could just be a mood thing, as I mentioned earlier. For whatever reason, my mindframe was such that I didn’t enjoy the books when I first read them — but right now? I’m having a ball. I’m totally in the mood for this level of silliness, combined with an underpinning of true emotions and friendship (and in the case of book #2, Imprudence, which I’m listening to now, some super sexy flirtation doesn’t hurt a bit).
Anyway, all this has made me wonder: How common is it to have strongly different opinions about the same books?
I do think it’s fairly common to re-read a book we remember loving, and find it a let down when rereading years later. But how about the opposite?
Have you ever felt “meh” (or worse) about a book, and then felt really differently about it when you read it again? And further, do you ever re-read books that you didn’t love the first time you read them?
I’d love to hear about other people’s experiences! Please share your thoughts.