Top 5 Tuesday: Top 5 classics I’m not interested in reading

Top 5 Tuesday is a weekly meme hosted by Meeghan Reads — check out the next batch of upcoming topics here.

The theme for September is classics, and the this week’s topic is Top 5 classics I’m not interested in reading. I struggled at first — I have plenty of classics that I do want to read, but I’ve never really thought about identifying books NOT to read!

After some thought, plus random scrolling through my reading history and a bunch of Goodreads lists, I came up with the following five classics that I just can’t see myself ever picking up:

  1. War and Peace by Leo Tolstoy: Never gonna happen! And I actually read Anna Karenina (many years ago), so it’s not like I refuse this author absolutely. I just can’t see myself feeling motivated enough to try this one.
  2. The Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner: On the other hand, I can safely say that I will never read a Faulkner novel, after a truly dismal experience with one of his books way back in my college days.
  3. The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas: Honestly, it’s mainly the length of this book that’s so off-putting for me! Someone from my book group keeps suggesting this book as a group read… and if that actually happens, I may give in. But on my own? Nope.
  4. To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf: Another author I just don’t get along with. I’ve tried!
  5. Crime and Punishment by Fyodor Dostoyevsky: No interest whatsoever!

What classics are on your “never gonna read” list? And are there any of mine that you think I should reconsider?

If you wrote a T5T post, please share your link!

26 thoughts on “Top 5 Tuesday: Top 5 classics I’m not interested in reading

  1. I’m with you on the Count of Monte Cristo. It’s huge which is really off putting. The recent TV series was supposed to be quite good so I might just watch that instead. I did enjoy War and Peace though.

  2. A friend of mine told me years ago she thought I’d like the Sound and the Fury because one of the characters codes as autistic. I have yet to find the motivation to actually discover if she’s right or not, but I did find an inexpensive copy of it a while ago, so I do have it on hand in case I ever do.

  3. There was a time when I said I wouldn’t read/wasn’t interested in Count of Monte Cristo, but I kept getting curious the more I hear about it. So I’d like to try it, to see if it’s a revenge story I’d actually like.

    By the way, Frankenstein is haunting me. I keep seeing it mentioned often lately, so I’m taking that as a sign to read it in October. If you’re up for/able to do a buddy read of it then, let me know.

    • Oh, great idea about Frankenstein! I might be interested — I’ll be away next week, but once I’m back and get a chance to regroup, I’d consider it!

      Re Count of Monte Cristo, I do hear good things — it’s really just committing to such a long book that would keep me away.

  4. I have read War and Peace, and Crime and Punishment, and The Count of Monte Cristo.The latter is worth reading. It might be bulky, but really is a fast-paced and entertaining story. Every Dumas’ I have read, I just couldn’t stop after a few chapters, LOL.Tolstoy were a real struggle, I think I’ve skipped at least 25% of it. Crime and Punishment is slightly better, but is quite dark. While The Sound and the Fury, I have tried once, but couldn’t pass more than the first two or three pages.Virginia Woolf, I have stopped reading altogether after Mrs. Dalloway. 😛

  5. I came to reading late in life yet I have read Crime and Punishment and The Count of Monte Cristo because I thought I had to catch up! I enjoyed them both and I would jump at the opportunity to read them, again, with a book club.

  6. I went through a Virginia Woolf period for awhile where I read all of her books and some of her journals, too. But she’s not for everyone, that’s for sure. And War and Peace is one classic I will never read either. It’s just too long. But then I feel that way about most Russian classics. ;D

Comments... We love comments!